Comparing the best
low-code platforms for developers

Top features:

• Seamless scalability. Serve 100 or 100,000 users without performance issues.
• Customize, personalize, and power-up your tools by integrating your own code.
• GDPR compliant, with EU-only servers and infrastructure. Zero data processing outside of the EU.

Main Benefits

• Free forever. Only pay when your app goes above 100 monthly views.
• Support and documentation to suit your learning style.
• Powerful automations and pre-coded logic.
• Extensive platform and API integrations.

Appian is all about automating business processes. Tools built with Appian can be just as beneficial for customers as internal teams. If you have complicated data flows in your business, Appian can be a fine choice.

Top features

• In-built generative AI for document processing and automation.
• Reactive web and native mobile design - build once, launch everywhere.
• Process mining gives you a view of inefficiencies in the real-world usage of your apps.

Pros and cons

• Quality of UI is mentioned regularly in customer reviews.
• Powerful automations, enhanced by AI.
• All the tools you need in-platform.
• Steep learning curve. Even experienced users will need to spend time learning Appian’s most complex tasks.
• Some reviewers note a lack of integration with popular tools (e.g. Figma).
• Restrictive and potentially expensive pricing models.

Outsystems is popular and well-liked as a low-code platform. Its users build applications for both external and internal use, which speaks to its versatility. The platform is technology-led, with priority placed on features like cloud hosting and scalability.

Top features

• Full-stack development.
• Applications can scale to enterprise-level.
• Cloud-native architecture offers improved uptime and performance.

Pros and cons

• Reviewers praise the speed of the development environment and the tools it creates.
• Users can build one app for free, providing a great (if limited) starting point.
• Mobile development capabilities are highly praised.
• Reviewers share frustration at a lack of branching for development and deployment.
• Self-hosting and ISO-standard compliance only available at enterprise level.
• Not built with smaller organizations and teams as the target users.